I think that no matter who they casted in the movie, we would all say they could never equal the original cast. So, since the original cast is not in it, we would be disappointed in whoever they picked. And it didn't help that the last Dukes Reunion film was awful. That wasn't the cast fault, it was the script. The first was great. So the studio, fearing that the movie would get the same reception that the reunion show did, probably forced the current cast on the film makers. "You can make the movie, but you must get people the current teens will relate to." To the current teens, Bo Duke is Clark Kent's father and is probably uncool. We have to remember.....even though Dukes of Hazzard was #1 in it's time slot every year but one....it was hated by critics and everyone else. And the fans that watched are in their 30's and 40's now...and that age group doesn't drive the big ticket sales at the box office. In a recent BBC poll in England, Dukes Of Hazzard was rated as one of the Top 10 worst imports from the United States. So as much as we hate the current cast....it was the only way we would ever get a mainstream theatrical film out of it. And no matter who they cast, it would pale in comparison to our love of the original. So for the movie to make any money, they would have to cast who they did. Because it would be a critical bomb no matter which cast they put in it.